October 18, 2006

Octa-Decimal Classification (ODC) : A New Approach in Library Classification

 

In general, there are two kind of methods used in designing library classification schemes for content analysis of universe of subjects. The first method designs the scheme completely on the basis of the actual collections available in a library which can only provide an overall picture of universe of subjects in limited period but not an overall picture of universe of subjects. Therefore, it is unable to accurately reveal the overall situation of the universe of subjects, especially its neglected areas. The other methods designs it on the basis of the essence of growing universe of subjects which is created before analyzing the universe of subjects, so it is able to accurately reveal the overall situation of universe of subjects. Therefore, using the second method of classification, an attempt has been made to design a simplified, wider, and more flexible library classification scheme, with the help of relatively a few notational systems.

 

1. What is ODC?

The word octadecimal is combination of two words octa and decimal. The word octa comes from Greek word "okta" which means eight and the word decimal means ten. Therefore, octa-decimal system uses eighteen base notation, from 0 to 9 and A to H. Its base is comparatively broader than the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), a library classification scheme devised by Melvil Dewey in 1876, which uses the numbers 0 to9. In DDC, ten base numbers have been employed in order to accommodate all the universe of subjects. Likewise, the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) also uses ten base numbers, i.e. 0-9. These schemes have narrow base. Unlike DDC and UDC, Colon Classification (CC), proposed by S. R. Ranganathan, has used so many notations that it causes difficulty to both the users and library professionals. Hence, ODC has proposed comparatively longer base than DDC and UDC, but shorter base than CC because "the longer the base, the shorter will be the average number of digits in a class number, or an isolate number. The digits used in a class number need not have cardinal values, since the class number is used only for arrangement and not for counting. Therefore, the digits used in the notational system need not consist only of letters of an alphabet or Arabic numerals. It may have mixed notational system also" (Kent:1971, P. 164).

 

2. Why ODC?

ODC is designed as a standard scheme for classification to suit the purpose of the large number of users by introducing simple notational system to provide wide coverage, and has emerged into this modern world of many novel areas of knowledge.

The Library classification schemes for knowledge management in current use in the world such as DDC, UDC, LC, CC, BC etc., are somewhat focused toward their country of origin, thereby ignoring the other countries, Revisions and relocations are done quite frequently and also on a large scale.

In order to meet, effectively and productively, the onslaught of the ever-growing universe of subjects, a scheme for library classification needs to be developed so that it can easily provide somewhere to stay new developments without disturbing the basic structure of the scheme. The OC is without a doubt the best general classification scheme to meet such challenge. Not only is its basic pattern superior, but the flexibility to special needs, which is one of its main features, ensures a particularly appropriate order if a local variant is called for. Moreover, the numbering system, which maintains its order, is brevity and is often highly mnemonic, too. 

DDC has not acknowledged geographical division of SAARC except India and we can say that Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Bhutan and Maldives appear a part of India according to DDC 22nd edition due to short base of it. However, we are using this scheme because there is no alternative scheme compare to DDC. Now it is essential to plan to develop another scheme, which can solve such problems.

Since the facet indicator should be simple and easily remembered to distinguish or separate the character of the ideas represented by facets. So OC has very simple or easily remembered notation i.e. Roman Capitals (no mathematical symbols and punctuation marks) for facet indicator. This type of notation for facet indicator is easy to distinguish the idea and shelving books or filling catalogue cards also.

ODC is based on theory of library classification developed by classificationists and it does not have many rules and instructions to use. It will not require reference tools to use it at the time of classifying documents.

The growth of universe of knowledge is ever accelerating. It tends to become turbulently dynamic. Therefore, CC has increased its main class but divisions, sections, and facets are limited within octal numbering systems, i.e. 1 to 8 and it must result in very long numbers for compound as well as complex subjects. Unlike CC, ODC has increased not only its main classes but also its divisions, sections, and so on equally. Therefore, it covers more subjects by using limited number of notation(s).

 

3. Objectives

  • To provide a method for arranging books on library shelves in an order which is helpful to the users;
  • To provide a method of arranging substitutes of the books themselves in a card catalogue and printed bibliography;
  • To provide a method for arranging electronic data on internet in an order this is helpful to the users;

 4. Principles

  • It is a classification in the strictest sense depending on the analysis of idea context, so that related concepts are brought together, and haphazard arrangements like alphabetical order, evolutionary order, etc. is avoided;
  • Both coordination and subordination are placing side by side of those classes, which are most like in subject mater. It is remembered that these classes are not divisions of one another, but are classes arranged according to their closeness of relationship in subject interest, and are often of equal rank;
  • It is an octadecimal classification, constructed on the principle of proceeding from the general to the more particular by the division of the whole human knowledge into 18 main classes, 324 divisions, 5832 sections and so on, each further subdivided octadecimally to the required degree;
  • Each main class represents either a broad discipline or a group of related disciplines. However, this is not true for 0 (Zero) main class generalities. This class indicates varied subjects;
  • It is an aspect classification, in which a phenomenon is classed according to the context or discipline in which it is considered. For example, the term 'Morphology' occurs in widely different fields, such as Biology, Botany, Zoology, Medical Science, Crystallography, and Linguistics. A book entitled 'Introduction to Morphology' should be classified only after ascertaining the context in which the term morphology has been used in the book as well as in the scheme.

 

Principles for growing universe of subjects

 i. Extrapolation in an array                          

An array of class numbers should admit of any number of new coordinate numbers being added at the end of the array is called extrapolation in an array.

 "The number of coordinate ideas based on a characteristic may be larger than the number of digits in the base of the notational system. In meeting such a situation, Ranganathan's theory uses sector notation. In sector notation, the last digit of a species of digits is made semantically empty but allowed to retain its ordinal value." (Kent: 1971, P. 164). It is a method used for increasing the capacity of an array with the help of an empty digit. It becomes possible to add unlimited numbers to represent coordinate ideas. An empty digit is a digit with ordinal value but without semantic value. Roman capital “J” is used as an empty digit.

Let us consider the following sequence, made up octadecimal numbering system:

0 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  J0  J1  J2  J3  J4  J5  J6  J7  J8  J9  JA  JB  JC  JD  JE … JH  JJ0  JJ1  JJ2 …JJH and so on.

Let us assume that J is an empty digit. In that case it would have ordinal value but no semantic value. In other words, J by itself has no meaning. But J0 is meaningful. Similarly, other numbers beginning with a single, double J or triple J and so on are meaningful numbers.

Let us assume that J0 represents a class coordinate with the classes represented by digits from 0 to 9 and A to H. Similarly, we may assume that numbers J1, J2, J3, J4 and so on are all postulated to represent classes coordinate with classes represented by digits from 0 to 9 and A to H.

 ii. Interpolation in an array

An array of class numbers should admit of the interpolation of any number of new coordinate numbers being added at any point in the array is called Interpolation in an array.

"As the universe of subjects develops, a new main subject may emerge. The idea plane will ask for it to be interpolated between two main subjects already listed in the schedule. The class number of these two main subjects may each consist of single digits which are consecutive in the ordinal scale of the notational system. Therefore, no digit would be available to represent the new main subject. To meet the situation Ranganathan's theory uses the concept of emptying digit." (Kent: 1971, P. 165).The emptying digit is a digit which has its usual ordinal value as well as semantic value, “having the power to deprive the preceding rich digit of its power of representing an idea”.

With the help of an emptying digit a new number between any two existing class numbers in an array can be interpolated.

An emptying digit deprives the preceding digit of its semantic value in a digit group, but retains the ordinal value allotted to it. It helps in interpolation between two consecutive ordinal numbers if there is no gap available between them. Roman capitals “X”, “Y”, and “Z” can be employed as emptying digits.

The Roman capital "X" is known as forward interpolation, the Roman capital "Y" is known as central interpolation and Roman capital "Z" is known as backward interpolation in array.

 

5. Characteristics

  • It covers more subjects by using few numbers of notations;
  • It has simplified subject relation system to combine / relate subjects and facets;           
  • It has very simple or easily remembered notation for facet indicator, i.e. L is for language, M is for matter, P is for person, T is for time,  etc;
  • It has more hospitality in chain due to octadecimal fraction and in array due to quite broad base number;
  • It has least number of digits in every facet, so it will be easy to store in our memory;
  • It has provision of infinite extrapolation for increasing the capacity of an array;
  • It has provision of interpolation for new subjects between any two consecutive ordinal numbers;
  • It has very good mnemonics quality notations;
  • It has very simple shelving or filing order.

 6. Notational System

Definition: A notational system in a faceted classification scheme is combination of two sets of symbols having a particular ordinal value of each symbol. One set of symbols is used to represent the classes and their subdivisions. Another set of symbols is used to represent the facet indicators.

OC has mixed base, linear, right-handed, multi-partite, and octadecimal fractional notation. The octadecimal point in the beginning is omitted.

OC has used the following four species of digits:

10          Indo-Arabic numerals (0 to 9)

22          Roman capitals (A to Z excluding I, N, O, & V)      

  1         Punctuation mark (dot   “.”)

 

Indo-Arabic numerals "0 to 9" and Roman capitals "A to H" are used to form Octadecimal numbering system;
Roman capital “J” is used as an empty digit;
Punctuation mark dot   “.” is used to represent for facet indicator of special auxiliary;
Roman capitals “K, L, M, P, Q, T, and W” are used to represent for facet indicator of common auxiliaries;
Roman capitals “R and S” are used to represent for indicator digits of relation of subjects;
Roman capitals “X, Y, Z” are used as an emptying digit;
Roman capital “U” is used to represent for facet indicator of subject device;

 

7. Ordinal value of digits in Octadecimal Numbering System

The numbering system, having eighteen base numbers, is called octadecimal-numbering system. These eighteen symbols are 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, & H. and place values increase in the power of 18. Each digit of a base has a particular ordinal value, which defines the position of a digit in a series. For example, digit 5 in an octadecimal numbering system comes after 4, and before 6. In other words, the position of digit 5 in the series 0 to 9& A to H is 6th in order. Similarly, all the digits in base, weather it consists of numerals or alphabets or both, possess a particular ordinal value. It is the ordinal value of the digits that facilitates the arrangement of entities in a group in classification.

 

8. Shelving or Filing Order

The filing order of ODC is based on a progression from general to particular, so the main class generalities and common auxiliaries which are general by definition come first. Secondly, the simple number comes; thirdly, the simple number linked by notation dot “.” is filed after simple number. Fourthly, the compound subjects of those simple subjects come. Complex subjects are more particular than simple subjects by definition, so they file in the last. 

 

Examples

0L6E5         Nepali language

0PL6E5      Nepali speaking people

0PW76        Nepalese

0TFC          Twenty first century in AD

0K35           Handbooks

0W76          Nepal

E8               Inorganic chemistry

E8.8            Ores of Inorganic chemistry

E80L6E5    Documents in Nepali about Inorganic chemistry

E80PW76   Inorganic chemistry for Nepalese people

E80TC0      Inorganic chemistry of 21st century in AD

E80K35      Handbooks of Inorganic chemistry

E80W76     Inorganic substances in Nepal

E81             Alkali metals

E813           Sodium

E813.F3     Sodium chloride

E8F3          Chlorine

E8R7A       Difference between Inorganic and Organic chemistry

E8UF         The inorganic elements technology

 9 Citation Order 

Citation order means the order in which the facets or elements (building blocks) are combined when a compound number is built. If the classification is used pre-coordinately to organize books on the shelf in a library or create a systematic display on an OPAC, the combination order is pre-determined to ensure consistency.

The citation order and filing order are generally reverse to each other.

Therefore, the citation order for the OC is:

W T Q P M L K

For example: The class number of “Bibliography of politics of Nepal in 20th century” is A0W76 TB9K2, i.e. A is main class which represents “Political science” W76 is a facet which represents Geographical area, Nepal, similarly  TB9 is also a facet which represents 20th century, likewise K2 is also a facet which represents Bibliography. Zero before W is added according to the rule of OC, i.e. One zero is added before first auxiliary. All facets have combined with the help of citation order.

 “Any systematic arrangement, which breaks the whole collection into groups, is certainly better than haphazard arrangement. Some arrangements are better than others. We should choose that arrangement which meets our requirements in the best possible manner. Choice should thus take into consideration the purposes for which the users use books. Library classification scheme must be purpose-oriented” (Krishna Kumar:1991, P. 234).

The octadecimal classification scheme is a purpose-oriented library classification scheme. The whole schedule of OC is subject arrangement i.e. classification by subjects. But other type of arrangement is also possible by using this scheme, i.e. to give greater priority to any facet in a compound number by citing it first.

The other types of classification are as follows: -

 

i. Linguistic Classification

Linguistic classification is the arrangement by language throughout. Thus books are separated first by language and then are arranged by subject within the language. This principle also comes into use when an author’s works are separated into editions and translation.

Examples:

0L619UE5   English language – Physics

0L6DDUE8 Maithali language – Inorganic chemistry

0L6E5UEB  Nepali language –Environmental Science

 ii. Chronological Classification

Chronological Classification is a supplementary arrangement of material in a suborder according to time or period in which the subject is consider. Thus books are separated first by period or time and then are arranged by subject.

   Examples:

0T90U32                     10th century BC - Hinduism
0TB9UH                     20th century- Agricultural Sciences
0TC0UF                      21st century- Technology

 iii. Classification by form

Classification by form is the arrangement by type of publication. Thus books are separated first by form and then are arranged by subject. It is used in all system where all encyclopedias, directories, dictionaries, and periodicals are picked out from the other books in their subjects and put in a separate section or department.

   Examples:

0K31UE                      Encyclopedias – Science
0K33UE5                    Dictionaries – Physics
0K51UF                      Periodicals – Technology

iv. Classification by place

Classification by place is the arrangement by place. Thus books are separated the place with which it is concerned and then are arranged by subject.

   Examples:

0W76U9                     Nepal – History
0W78U8                     Maldives – Geography
0WH3UA                   United States - Politics

The library collections can be arranged by different way with the help of citation order. Thus the variation of citation order satisfies the purpose-oriented library classification.

 10.  Parts of the scheme

The scheme consists of:
 i. Schedules
ii. Auxiliaries
iii. Relation of subjects
iv. Subject Device
v. Index

 10. i. a. Main schedule:

The universe of subjects has been organized into three broader groups and divided into eighteen main classes. 

 

1-6       Humanities

7-D      Social Sciences

E-H     Science and Technology

0         Generalities
1            Philosophy
2            Psychology
3            Religions. Theology
3            Religions. Theology
4            Languages. Linguistics
5            Literature
6            The arts. Music. Sports
7            Education
8            Geography
9            History
A            Political Sciences
B            Social Sciences
C            Law Jurisprudence
E            Pure Sciences
F            Technology. Engineering. Computer Science
G            Medical Sciences
H            Agricultural Sciences. Animal husbandry
D           Economics

The above order of main classes is based on helpful sequence of subjects, e.g. Language (4) is related to Literature (5). So, they are placed next to each other. Similarly, History and Political Science are placed adjacent to each other because their close relationship. The above main classes indicate that each main class represents either a broad discipline or a group of related disciplines. However, this is not true for 0 classes. This class includes varied subjects. Each main class has eighteen divisions. The eighteen divisions of main class E “Pure Science” are given below:

E0                   General Sciences
E1                   Fundamental Mathematics
E2                   Applied Mathematics
E3                   Astronomy
E4                   Mathematical Physics
E5                   Physics
E6                   [VACANT]
E7                   Chemistry
E8                   Inorganic Chemistry
E9                   Physical Chemistry
EA                   Organic Chemistry
EB                   Earth Science
EC                   Paleontology
ED                   Environmental Science
EE                   Biological Science
EF                   Microbiology
EG                  Botany
EH                  Zoology

 

The coordination and subordination of mathematics, chemistry and biology are placed side by side where as in DDC & UDC only biology are placed side by side. Each division has eighteen sections and so on

 10. i. b. The fused subject schedule

"A new main subject may emerge by the fusion of two or more main subjects. Biophysics, bioengineering, and biochemistry are examples of such fused main subjects." (Kent: 1971, P. 166).

In this schedule, two or more subjects of main schedule are fused together in such way that each of them loses its individuality, gives a new main subject. These subjects are compound (not complex) subjects taken from fused relation. The subject whose class number is the earlier class number is cited as the first subject. In other words, the subjects are arranged in ascending order of the class number.

The indicator digits for fused subject relation at zero level is S0, at first level is S1, at second level is S2, at third level is S3, at fourth level is S4 and at fifth level is S5.

If there is no common digit between two or more ODC numbers is known as zero level relation; similarly if there is one common digit between two or more ODC numbers is known as first level relation and so on.

For example, the class number for “Biochemistry” would be E7S1E. Here, biochemistry is neither biology nor chemistry, but it is a new subject achieved by the fusion of “Biology” and “Chemistry”. The class number of biochemistry "E7S1E” is taken from fused relation. Its divisions and sections are also possible. In this fused subject schedule, the possible divisions and sections of fused subjects are assigned. The schedule is not listed in one place and not treated as main subjects. So, OC has not shelved the fused subjects with main subjects is its limitation because fused subjects are not complex subjects.

Examples:

4S0B               Socio-linguistics
8S0A               Geopolitics
E3S15             Astrophysics
E3S17             Astro-chemistry
E3S1E             Astrobiology
E7S1E0K2      Bibliography of biochemistry
E7S1B             Geochemistry
ECS0GUF      Biomedical Engineering

 

10.ii. Auxiliaries

The auxiliaries help in eliminating repetition in the various schedules they group certain recurring and general subordinate concepts such as language table, area table, time table, person table, variant table, etc. The table of auxiliaries serves the mnemonic function as well. The ODC uses two kinds of auxiliaries: general or common and special. The common auxiliaries can be used in all the schedules of the scheme where as special auxiliaries can be used only in specific schedules or their parts. The notation Zero “0” is added before first auxiliaries only while combining the two or more auxiliaries in a simple subject. 


10.ii. a. Common auxiliaries

The common auxiliaries are applicable through out the various main schedules, fused subject schedules. The various tables of common auxiliaries and their connecting symbols are given in the following table:

 

Common Auxiliaries

Facet Indicator

Kasto Table

K

Language Table

L

Matter Table

M

Person Table

P

Quality Table

Q

Time Table

T

Area Table

W

 

Examples:

A0W76                   Politics of Nepal

A0W76V2              Bibliography of Politics of Nepal

A0W76TB9K2K2  Bibliography of bibliography of Politics of Nepal of 21st century in AD

 

10. ii. b. Special auxiliaries

The special auxiliaries, unlike the common auxiliaries are not listed in one place, and do not have such extensive applicability. They occur at various places in the schedules, and express concepts that are recurrent, but in a more limited subject range. The facet indicator of special auxiliary is “.” dot.

Examples:

56C1.1         Sanskrit poems

E8.8              Ores of inorganic elements

E884.6          Physical properties of iron elements

 10. iii. Relation of subjects

One of the modes of formation of subjects in the universe of subjects is called loose assemblage. Loose assemblage mode of formation is concerned with mutual relation and is represented by relation of subjects in library classification.

 OC has provided the following six kinds of relationship between two or more subjects:

a. General relation
b. Comparison / difference
c. Bias
d. Fused
e. Tool
f. Influence

 

        Table of indicators digits in different levels of relations

Kinds of Relations

Zero level

First level

Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level

General

R0

R1

R2

R3

R4

R5

Comparison/Difference

R6

R7

R8

R9

RA

RB

Bias

RC

RD

RE

RF

RG

RH

Fused

S0

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5

Influence

S6

S7

S8

S9

SA

SB

Tool

SC

SD

SE

SF

SG

SH

 

Examples

2RCG              Psychology for doctors
33S72              Influence of Hinduism on Buddhism
3BR7F            Comparison between Judaism and Islam
8R0A              General relation between geography and political science
E2RD5            Statistics for physicists
E5R77.E         Difference between physics, chemistry and biology
EGR1H           The General relation between botany and zoology

 

11. iv. Subject Device

 A full schedule developed at one place is repeated by analogy at other places or some classes of materials are given the same development as the whole classification. The Roman capital ‘U’ is the indicator digit for universe of subjects. It is used to combine schedule to schedule, and is known as subject device. The notation ‘U’ in the beginning is disappeared. But it is appeared in middle. It is not a common auxiliary so don’t prescribe notation zero “0” before it.

Examples:

GUF                Medical technology (not G0UF)
HUF                Agricultural technology (not H0UF)
This device is also used to apply a subject as common auxiliaries; e.g.
32                    Hinduism
33                    Buddhism
330WU3C       Buddhism in Christanity areas
3C                   Christianity
3C0WU32       Christanity in Hindu areas

 10. v. Index

Index entries of common auxiliaries and schedules are arranged alphabetically word by word in the last part of the scheme.

 11. Conclusion

The publication of new documents on various subjects is increasing day by day. It is a good indication for the readers. But it is being challenged to the librarians to organize their library collections in such a manner that could help reduce the time of library personnel in organizing and also helping to reduce the time of users in retrieve their desired library documents with ease and accurate in a least possible time. In order to meet, effectively and productively, the onslaught of the ever-growing universe of subjects, a scheme for library classification needs to be developed so that it can easily provide somewhere to stay new developments without disturbing the basic structure of the scheme. The ODC is without a doubt the best general classification scheme to meet such a challenge. Not merely is its basic pattern superior, but the flexibility to special needs which is one of its main features ensures a particularly appropriate order if a local variant is called for. Moreover, the numbering system which maintains its order is brevity and is often highly mnemonic, too. It is focused on Nepalese literature, languages, history of all periods, geographical divisions at district level. Since this study will make a comparatively and get insight into the scheme feasibility so that it could reduce other scheme especially in the libraries of Nepal.

References    
  •  Corea, Ishvari; Ojuando, Gad David; Farugi, Khalid Kamal (Ed.) (1993), Encyclopedia of information and library science, Akashdeep Publishing House, New Delhi.
  • Dewey, Melvil (1996), Dewey decimal classification and relative index, Mitchell, Joan S. (Ed.), 21st ed., Forest, New York.
  • Kent, Allen; Lancour, Harold (1971), Encyclopedia of library and information science, Marcel Dekker, New York.
  • Khanna, J. K.; Kapil, D. D. (1982), Colon classification, Ess Ess Publications, New Delhi.       
  • Khanna, J. K.; Vohra, R. (1986), Handbook of library classification systems, Beacon Books, New Delhi.
  • Khanna, J. K. (1984), Analytico-synthetic classification, ESS ESS, New Deldhi.                 
  • Krishan Kumar (1991), Library manual, 4th ed., Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi.
  • Krishan Kumar (1979), Theory of classification, 4th rev. ed., Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi.
  • Ranganathan, S. R. (1979), Prolegomena to library classification, 3rd ed., Asia Publishing House, Bombay.
  • Ranganathan, S. R. (1960), Colon classification : basic classification, 6th ed., Asia Publishing House, Bombay.
  • Sengupta, B.; Ohdedar, A. K. (1971), Library classification, The World Press, Calcutta.

Websites

( This article  is  published in TULSSAA Journal, vol 5 No. 1, Kathmandu, 2006, pp.39)

0 comments: